Smash Your Cancer-You Can Win!

This is the third installment of this video series on Big Pharma and how it operates.  The bottom line is that Big Pharma’s biggest priority is to make money, and everything else is secondary.  This video series is an illustration of this.  Cancer patients need to understand these facts before agreeing to any treatments that involve drugs, especially with drugs as toxic as chemotherapy.  If these people are this ruthless and profit-seeking with these drugs, how much confidence does that inspire in a patient who may be seen as nothing more than a profitable sale?

I am not accusing all physicians of being complicit in this.  Although they ought to know better, many physicians have been subjected to indoctrination by medical school educations that have been heavily influenced by Big Pharma.  So most doctors have a definite bias towards the use of drugs.  Even the highly intelligent physician will be very hesitant to go against the dogma and standard medical practices that call for heavy use of drugs.  Any physician that strays from conventional, approved treatments risks heavy punishments, sanctions, fines, imprisonment and loss of his license to practice medicine.

This video discusses the use of statins.  They are for cholesterol reduction, but are known to be dangerous.  Most pharmaceutical drugs are harmful, unfortunately.  This doesn’t slow down or stop the number of prescriptions though.

In addition, there are rampant conflicts-of-interest in the pharmaceutical and medical industries.  Many experts are not as impartial as we are led to believe, and can have financial ties to drug manufacturers.  Of course, none of this is disclosed to unsuspecting patients.

Pharmaceutical companies work to find new indications for drugs so that they can extend patent protection.  This can mean many millions of dollars in additional profits.  Not only do they push to have their drugs prescribed for new disorders, but they also attempt to create ailments for which their drugs can be prescribed.  One example is Paxil®.  It was first marketed as a treatment for depression, but was then pushed as a treatment for social anxiety disorder.  Many of these new disorders are questionable.  They may not even be disorders or diseases.  Restless leg syndrome is another one of these contrived disorders that serve as another excuse for physicians to write prescriptions to fatten the coffers of pharmaceutical corporations.

Another questionable move was for Eli Lilly to simply repackage their blockbuster drug, Prozac®, as Sarafem®.  Prozac® was used to treat depression.  Sarafem® is used to treat a new disorder called premenstrual dysphoric disorder, which may not even be a disorder, but a profit-driven creation to create an excuse to expand the market for Prozac®. They spend $30 million on a marketing and public relations campaign to create the market for Sarafem®.

In short, Big Pharma often works to use their creation of images, advertising ingenuity, and huge financial resources to create market demand where none may exist.  They do this to make many millions and billions of dollars in profit.  This can come at the expense of patients, as these pharmaceutical drugs are not innocuous.

This is the 2nd installment of this video series on Big Pharma and how they are more focused on making money than on treating patients.  We are literally drowning in prescription medications.  The most amazing part of this is that most ‘new’ drugs that are released to the market are either old drugs that are given a new name, or ‘me too’ drugs that are not really any more effective than the drugs that they are replacing.

The bottom line is that patients are being used as profit patsies.  One drug, Nexium®, is being pushed as a new drug, but it is essentially identical to the drug is it allegedly replacing, Prilosec®.  This move by the manufacturer of the drug made it one of the best-selling drugs in history.  The fact that it is not really different from the old drug shows that the marketing was what made this drug so popular. The old Over-the-counter (OTC) Prilosec® is $24, generic Prilosec® is $119, and the new, virtually identical Nexium® is $171.

Gullible patients who trust the Medical Establishment will not question or understand this sleight-of-hand.  The pharmaceutical companies can sell virtually anything they want to trusting consumers.  The many billions of dollars spent on pharmaceutical advertisements are definitely working.  These commercials are very brief and succinct in their content and effect.  In contrast, I went to actually find the full prescribing information for Prilosec® and found that it was 34 pages long!  And it is full of contraindications, side effects and other technical information that would probably be important to the people taking this drug.  I guarantee you that the vast majority of patients never read this material because is is very technical.  In short, this drug is not as benign as the ad would lead you to believe.

The only reason why Big Pharma can get away with this is because patients are not aware of what is really going on here.  Take conscious notice of the constant barrage of pharmaceutical commercials that come on the television the next time you watch.  It is amazing that they can run this many drug advertisements. Remember that the expense for these advertisements are included in the drug’s price.  Many people don’t care about the final price because health insurance takes care of a lot of it, but this cost is reflected in your bottom line, even if not immediately and directly.  It could be argued that these exorbitant pharmaceutical expenses are wrecking the country.  Economic times are not as good as they were before, and big corporations are not known for their concern for average people.  Just be more aware about what goes on ‘behind the scenes’ that are presented to us.  The first thing we have to do to fight this is to be aware that it is going on.

It is not a secret that Big Pharma inundates us with numerous advertisements for their drugs.  Anyone who watches television can attest to the massive amounts of drug commercials that run.  The reason they run these ads is because they work!

The marketing for Big Pharma drugs used to be focused on the health care practitioners (physicians).  But there has been a shift because today, pharmaceutical companies now spend many billions of dollars on marketing drugs to patients directly through television ads and other media.  The Direct To Consumer marketing has increased by over 500% during the period from 1996 to 2004.  The short story is that pharmaceutical companies spend many billions to influence how we think about drugs and health.

The commercials are always presented with lifestyle images and emotional themes.  They are very seductive and subtle.  They then associate the drug they are promoting with these images.  They then encourage people to ‘Ask Your Doctor’ about the drug being featured.  It is reported that many people do ask their doctors for drugs they have seen in these commercials.  Many doctors say that patients often do not even know the purpose of the drug about which they are inquiring!

This is very disturbing because the positives of the drugs are pushed while the side effects are purposely minimized.  The images are so powerful that the list of side effects that are read at the end of the commercial are nothing more than an afterthought.  This constant barrage of advertisements about drugs condition viewers to see pharmaceutical drugs as a healthy part of life.  But the truth is that pharmaceutical drugs are not the way to health.  Adverse drug reactions cause approximately 100,000 deaths and 1.5 million hospitalizations per year.

And Big Pharma companies actually try to say that their ads are educational for viewers!  That is a total lie!  The goal of these companies is to sell their drugs.  They do not spend billions of dollars to educate people. They spend the advertising money to get a return on these investments.  If these ads didn’t sell more drugs, they would not pay for them.

This article is not directly related to cancer, but it is just more information to allow you to understand how the medical system functions.  Although pharmaceutical companies are not directly a part of the medical infrastructure, they are one of the biggest parts of the medical system.  They influence the regulators, and have many associations with the major medical institutions.  In many cases, a lot of the government officials have been a part of the pharmaceutical companies.  There is a lot of interplay and relations between the top administrators of government and these corporations.  Don’t be a profit center for these people without being knowledgeable about these industry dynamics.

I couldn’t contain myself after going to a blog that discusses cancer treatments. They were essentially talking negatively about homeopathic treatments for cancer in this blog post.  I found it interesting.  I am not sure about the effectiveness of homeopathy treatments for any disease.  Personally, I haven’t seen or found any evidence for the effectiveness of homeopathy.  It seemed to me to be an easy target for derision.  I noticed that they didn’t choose to discuss any more efficacious treatments, such as Laetrile/B-17, Hoxsey’s formula, Essiac, etc.

So I went ahead and posted my own comments on the topic.  I think it was a board that will probably be adverse to my comments and views, but I went ahead and posted it anyway.  I’ll just post here what I said and let you check it out:

I’m not sure about the value of homeopathy, but I am sure about the stale, dated approaches of allopathic medicine to cancer treatment and the blatant, rampant conflicts of interest that are present in the cancer industry. The proverbial foxes are in charge of the hen house here. There are massive political and financial incentives for researchers and the people in control of the cancer establishment to perpetrate the status quo, and that is exactly what they do. You can take all the money that all alternative cancer practitioners have made, and it wouldn’t equal a tenth of one percent of the many hundreds of billions/trillions of dollars that the Medical Establishment have made over the years.

I’m not saying that all alternative cancer treatment methods are effective. But it is an insult to the intelligence of any thinking person to truly believe that NO ONE IN HISTORY has EVER come up with an effective, non-toxic treatment method for cancer over a 100 year period! Even if one just took the IUPAC list of chemicals and ran through them, you would eventually find one that was non-toxic and effective for cancer treatment. But you will find many credentialed, highly-acclaimed scientists who were politically destroyed because their treatments were a threat to huge financial interests that earn their money, status and power based on the status quo.

There is definitely a better approach to cancer treatment than chemotherapy drugs(based on chemical warfare agents), radiation(everybody knows how toxic this is) and surgery(butchery). How about something that does not destroy the immune system like chemo, but something that strengthens it? The toughest part of this is that many studies by the ‘authorities’ are stacked to insure that no ‘credible’ studies that prove that any alternative treatments are effective. Meanwhile, many thousands and millions of people have to suffer and die of cancer. For all of the hoopla about these ‘modern’ cancer treatments, they still haven’t found a cure, or even anything outside of the ‘holy three’ treatments. I wonder why that is, after 50+ years of research and many billions spent, we still have the exact same treatment methods. It doesn’t take a Ph.D. to understand this, but it does take someone willing to step outside of the conditioning and reverence to authority figures that work incessantly to enforce their ideas upon the minds of the unsuspecting public and those naive enough to believe that any scientific research can be 100% objective.

I’m not accusing the majority of physicians of being complicit with this.  I believe that most of them have been the victim of a medical education that has been crafted & designed according to the dictates of pharmaceutical companies.  I hope that people can one day receive more honest research and a fresh, more effective approach to cancer research and the medical education that physicians receive in school.

There have been ongoing arguments, debates and claims that the chemicals that are put in the water (for various reasons) are toxic or harmless, depending on what side of the ‘fence’ one happens to be on.  I have had my own feelings about the situation, and from the evidence that I’ve seen, there are definitely hazardous, dangerous, toxic, unhealthy chemicals being put in the water that we get from the tap as well as from bottled water sources.

In most water treatment facilities in the United States, chlorine is used as a disinfectant.  The disinfectant’s purpose is to reduce the amount of pathogenic (disease-causing) organisms that live in the water.  Chlorine also acts as a general biocide, killing germs, algae, and other micro-organisms.  Chlorine is more than 3 times as effective as a disinfectant against Escherichia coli than equivalent concentrations of bromine, and 6 times more effective than equivalent concentrations of iodine.

The problem with water chlorination is that the chlorine can react with naturally occurring organic compounds found in the water supply to produce dangerous compounds known as disinfection byproducts (DBP’s).  The most common DBP’s are haloacetic acids and trihalomethanes.  The scary part of this is that the risks for certain types of cancer are not being correlated with the use of chlorinated drinking water.  These DBP’s are now suspected of making the body more susceptible to cancer, and repeated ingestion of this chlorinated drinking water may raise cancer incidence up to 44% for populations that use this water.  It has also been found that there is a direct correlation between chlorine exposure and chronic depression.

Another notorious chemical that is used in drinking water treatment is fluoride.  One of the biggest problems with water fluoridation is that the form of fluoride that is added to drinking water is an industrial waste product from the phosphate fertilizer industry.  It is not like the sodium fluoride that is added to toothpaste because it is hydrofluosilicic acid, and is not pharmaceutical-grade.  It is a totally unpurified, industrial grade, corrosive acid which has been linked to increased levels of lead in children’s blood.

Although water fluoridation has been standard for water treatment for many years, it is time that the truth was known about it and widely disseminated.  Once again, large corporate interests have ‘stacked the deck’ on this issue so that they can continue to profit from poisoning people all for the sake of making huge profits.  The bottom line is that fluoride is not safe, and it can cause a huge number of ailments, such as dental fluorosis, heart disease, bone fractures, lower IQ, kidney disease, cancer, indigestion, asthma, etc.  It is also known to be a powerful hormone disruptor, and interferes with thyroid hormones and metabolism.

Some scientists are trying to warn people that fluoride is not save, and is actually a potent toxin.  Although it is illegal to dump this toxic poison into a river or body of water, what makes it suddenly safe to put directly into drinking water?  A telling attitude is that pro-fluoridation scientists are mostly unwilling to have any meaningful or intelligent discourse or discussion about the issue.  I suspect that this is because there is really no valid logical or scientific justification for mass medication of populations.

As always, if you really want to know the truth, you are going to have to find it yourself, or at least stray away from the propaganda that comes from the ‘experts’, authorities, and others who are ‘on the take’ to help multinational corporations earn obscene profits from dispensing poisons that keep you as their money ‘cash cow’.  Expand your mind and take back your power!

This sounds like a promising drug, but it is basically a pharmaceutical drug that is attempting to replicate the action of many cheaper, more effective, less toxic natural substances.

This drug, called Ipilimumab, is a drug that is alleged to cause the body’s immune system to fight the cancer instead of using the traditional strategy of using chemotherapy or radiation to directly kill cancer cells.  Unfortunately, this strategy also kills and damages normal body cells, and leads to severely debilitating side effects. Ipilimumab has side effects, and is reported to cause diarrhea, hepatitis and rashes in some patients. In fact, research results on this drug are mixed, and it is not certain whether or not this substance will prove to be effective.  This substance is a monoclonal antibody, and is not truly an agent that is specifically used to increase the integrity of the immune system.

As promising as this drug appears to be, it is claimed that it increases terminal melanoma patient’s life span 6-10 months.  This is a large percentage increase, but I can’t see calling a 10 month life expectancy an great breakthrough. Most people want to live long, healthy lives, and this doesn’t accomplish that.  The video also reports American Cancer Society statistics that show that melanoma cancer rates increased by 32% from 2000 to 2009 (i.e., from 47,000 cases of melanoma to 69,000).

Even though the physician on the video claims that this is a new approach to cancer treatment, it is only new to allopathic physicians because naturopaths and other alternative health care practitioners have known for years that the body’s own immune system is the only known mechanism that fights cancer and other things that attack the body.  No physician or health practitioner heals or cures anyone!  The only thing that can heal the body is itself! Anyone who tells you anything different is either lying to you or is ignorant of this truth.

It has been reported that rectal cancer rates in people under 40 years of age have been steadily rising for the last 20 years.  Cancer researchers and scientists say that they are baffled about this, and have no real idea of why this is the case.

Colon cancer, and related rectal cancer, are thought to have similar risk factors, but colon cancer rates have been constant while rectal cancer rates have grown by about 4% per year.  This was reported in the journal Cancer.  What is most disconcerting is that scientists have absolutely no idea why this is the case.  Rectal cancer rates in older population segments have been increasing as well, but this increase is probably due to more frequent cancer screenings which leads to more cases being diagnosed.

The rub is that people under 40 are not routinely screened for colorectal cancer unless they have a family history of cancer, which means that increased screening frequency does not account for the increased cancer rates in this group.  Colorectal cancer is the 2nd leading cause of death by cancer in the United States.  Rectal cancer is only a minor portion of these cancer deaths.

Most rectal cancers are caused by squamous cell carcinomas.  Anal cancers that are linked to anal sex are usually caused by the human papillomavirus (HPV), which is reported to be common in the gay community.  HPV usually causes adenocarcinomas, and are not likely to be related to this form of rectal cancer.

Typical symptoms of rectal cancer are: weight loss, diarrhea, anemia, a change in bowel habits, and bloody stools.  Risk factors for colorectal cancer include: a family history of colon cancer, a diet high in red meats, diet low in vegetables, heavy alcohol use, low vitamin D levels, smoking, and obesity.

This does not make sense to me.  After spending huge amounts of money on cancer research, and a War on Cancer that was started over 35 years ago, why are cancer rates increasing more rapidly than they ever have?  Either the people that are doing the research are unqualified or biased, they are unable to find the cure, or they are not really trying to find a cure.

It could also be the case that they actually do not wish to find a cancer cure because this would endanger the massive profitability of the present cancer industry.  There is no way that cancer is more complicated than quantum physics.  In fact, it is probable that oncologists, cancer researchers, and other medical researchers are purposely making the cancer disease more complex than it really has to be.  This is why the cancer experiments are structured to study obtuse, complex metabolic pathways in intricate studies, instead of focusing on human biological terrain and nutrient requirements.

The bottom line is that the nutritional status and the quality of diet are much more important factors in healing than any 500 elegant cancer experiments.  This is proven by the ineffectiveness of conventional cancer treatments, and the cancer experts’ inability to explain the reason why cancer rates are exploding after many hundreds of billions of dollars have been expended to find answers to these questions.  If we want a different result, we are going to have to change our ideas about cancer, and analyze the present thinking on cancer because these conventional ideas about cancer are obviously wrong.

Award-winning Professor of Medicine, Dr. Samuel Epstein speaks out on the truth about the American Cancer Society (ACS).  This video is about 5 minutes.

He starts by talking about how laden women’s cosmetics and many widely-used skin care products are full of carcinogenic chemicals that are readily absorbed through the skin.  He goes on to state that virtually the entire United States population is being exposed to hundreds of cancer causing chemicals every day, with no warnings.  He wonders how this can happen when the Food and Drug Administration is supposed to prevent this from happening.

He then describes the Cancer Establishment, which is led by the National Cancer Institute (NCI), which has a $4.2 billion annual budget, which is a 2,000% increase from the inception of the War on Cancer that was implemented by President Richard Nixon.  Unfortunately, the NCI is more concerned with cancer screening, cancer diagnosis and cancer treatment.  A small emphasis is placed on cancer research, but not as much as the average person would believe.  There is no emphasis on cancer prevention.  He gives the reason for this lack of priority placed on cancer prevention as a result of an entrenched mindset in scientific circles.  I do not agree with this, as the profit motive, along with a risk of professional ostracism, would appear to be a much more powerful threat to any medical heretic who would embrace an unorthodox cancer treatment method.

Mammography is touted as the best way for women to protect themselves from breast cancer.  Is this really the case?  It appears that, once again, we are being subjected to propaganda, media spin and an agenda of protecting corporate profits at the expense of cancer patients and unsuspecting victims of Big Pharma and related entities.  This video is about 10 minutes.

The American Cancer Society (ACS) vigorously promotes mammography as a woman’s best way to fight breast cancer while scaring up women with fears of contracting the disease.   It is reported that mammograms are not very accurate.  In fact, they have approximately a 70% failure rate!  The Nordic Cochrane Center reports that about 7,000 women per year are improperly diagnosed with breast cancer, which leads to unnecessary treatments.

Mammograms expose women to ionizing radiation, which is known to be a cause of cancer.  Annual mammograms actually increase a woman’s probability of being diagnosed with breast cancer by 150%.  This issue was also studied by the Radiological Society of North America, and they found that women under 20 who have had at least 5 mammograms are 2.5 times more likely to develop breast cancer than high risk women who never had mammograms.

To add insult to injury, the American Cancer Society is strongly linked to the mammography industry companies.  They are known for ignoring the development of viable, more effective alternatives to mammography.  ACS actually protests the interests of the major manufacturers of mammography equipment & instruments.  The major companies in this industry are Siemens, Piker, Eastman Kodak, DuPont and General Electric.  The media also plays a major role in promoting this message because they receive many billions of dollars for the advertisements that Big Pharma and related industries pay for in their public relations marketing campaigns.

DuPont is a major contributor to ACS, but also produces many chemicals that are carcinogenic.  It is almost as if the ACS and the chemical manufacturers have a sick symbiotic relationship.  The chemical manufacturers pay ACS off so that they don’t tell the public about the myriad of carcinogenic chemicals that they put in products and into the environment.  These chemicals then insure that cancer rates will continue to increase so that ACS will never run out of business.  And Big Pharma can keep on selling their exorbitantly expensive drugs that aren’t a cure, which ensures that cancer research funding will always be spent on searching for an elusive cure.  All the while the propaganda mill continues to run stories about all of the progress being made towards finding a cancer cure and that the cure is ‘just around the corner.’

AstraZeneca is another Big Pharma company that makes massive profits from this arrangement.  This company actually donates many billions of dollars to ACS, as well as being intimately involved in the ACS Breast Cancer Awareness campaign.  This public relations boondoggle focuses on mammography while ignoring prevention of cancer, and the carcinogenic industrial chemicals that are being pumped into the environment and into many consumer products.  In fact, AstraZeneca actually founded the Breast Cancer Awareness Month initiative.  The company is a spin off from Imperial Chemical Industries, a major manufacturer of petrochemicals and chlorinated organic products, including vinyl chloride.  Vinyl chloride has been directly linked to breast cancer.  In addition to this, AstraZeneca is the sole manufacturer of Tamoxifen, the world’s top selling anticancer drug.  What they fail to mention about Tamoxifen is that it is very toxic and can cause fatal uterine cancer and lethal blood clots, as well as liver cancer.

The bottom line is that ACS is the world’s largest non-religious charity with alliances with powerful corporations and other organizations.  The non-profit status of ACS is questionable when the policies and practices that consists of high overhead and expenses along with the accumulation of massive assets & their contributions to political parties.  I encourage you to do your own research on this so that you can learn about these shady practices.  What is really more important to ACS, curing cancer or accumulating wealth, riches and prestige?  Remember that ‘actions speak louder than words.’

This is another hard hitting video in the installment that reveals a lot of the lies, misconceptions and truth about the Cancer Industry and how the Medical Establishment works to maximize profits at the expense of helpless, misled, confused cancer patients.  This is not pretty, but it is the absolute truth.  Most physicians can’t speak out about this for the very high risk that they may lose their medical license to practice.  This video is a short 10 minutes, but it is crammed full of the essence of the problem with the conventional cancer treatment paradigm, and the reason why things have been this way for over 50 years.

In short, chemotherapy is derived from chemical warfare agents (specifically, the one called mustine). This is why most chemotherapeutic drugs are cytotoxic (kill cells).  They work by disrupting cellular division and DNA metabolism.  This is highly toxic, but is especially dangerous to fast-growing cells of the body, and not just cancer cells.  Cancer researchers can secure great profits, status, acclaim, grants and awards, jobs, papers and publications without succeeding in treating or curing cancer.

A big problem with the cancer industry is that researchers run experiments on cancer based on animal models.  Animals are biochemically different from people.  So animal experiment results are virtually worthless for human cancers.  What is true for animals may not hold for humans.  This makes all of the billions of dollars spent on research virtually worthless because most cancer experiments are ran on animal models.  The whole approach is to find a “magic bullet” cure for cancer with drugs that are patentable (i.e., profitable) for pharmaceutical companies.  They do not study the type of cancers (i.e., the metastatic tumors) that actually cause the bulk of cancer deaths.

Another suppressed fact about conventional cancer treatments are their highly damaging side effects.  Chemotherapy is extremely deadly.  It is cytotoxic, meaning that it is designed to kill cells, especially fast growing cells like cancer tumors.  But unfortunately, they also kill normal body cells as well.  Normal cells in the body that are also damaged by chemotherapy (because they grow rapidly) are bone marrow cells, the cells in the digestive tract, and hair follicles.  Other side effects of chemo are extreme nausea and vomiting, hair loss, and weight loss (cachexia).

Conventional cancer treatments commonly include surgery and radiation, and both of these are known to be dangerous and cause even more side effects.  Conventional treatments are often called “slash and burn” because it consists of cutting out the affected organs, poisoning the body with chemo and then burning it with radiation.  Another very serious side effect of chemotherapy is called chemobrain, and it is caused because chemo is very toxic to the brain.  Chemo causes brain damage that often leads to memory loss, vision problems, impaired orientation, deterioration of cognitive function, and brain shrinkage.  Chemo is also responsible for causing massive DNA damage that increases a patient’s probability of contracting leukemia later on in life.  In fact, one of the most common side effects of chemotherapy is CANCER!  Astonishingly , chemotherapy and radiation therapy increase the risks of a patient developing future cancers by 300%!

Some researchers found out the truth about conventional cancer therapy, and they reported on it.  Dr. Hardin B Jones, professor at University of California, conducted a 25 year study that examined the life expectancy of people with cancer and concluded that untreated cancer patients didn’t die sooner than patients who received surgery, radiation and chemotherapy.  He actually found that patients who refused conventional cancer treatments actually lived about FOUR TIMES LONGER than those who took them!  These findings have never been refuted to date, and his findings have actually been verified by other researchers.

A Dr. Maurice Fox, an MIT biologist, found that cancer patients that refused conventional cancer therapy had lower mortality rates than those who accepted it.  Dr. Ulrich Abel, a highly-respected German epidemiologist from the Tumor Clinic of the University of Heidelberg, conducted an extensive review of the research that had been done on chemotherapy drugs.  In his paper entitled Chemotherapy of Advanced Epithelial Cancer (which was published in the prestigious medical journal, The Lancet) found that there was NO scientific evidence to demonstrate that chemotherapy could extend the lives of cancer patients with the most common cancers.  He actually said that chemotherapy is a “scientific wasteland” and that neither physician or patients were willing to give it up even though there is NO scientific evidence that it works.  He says that 80% of chemotherapy that is given is totally worthless.

This information is very disturbing, especially to people who have chosen to believe the pronouncements of the ‘experts’ in the Medical Establishment.  But this is the absolute truth about how the cancer industry functions.  The bottom line is that each cancer patient is worth hundreds of thousands of dollars to the cancer industry.  The goal of the cancer industry is to sell their expensive poisons to patients.  The ‘treatments’ for cancer promote cancer and leads to even more cancer and diseases that turn patients into repeat customers.  Instead of curing diseased patients, their diseases are managed with a lifetime of expensive, highly profitable drugs, doctor’s visits and treatments, while anything that may actually cure the patient is called quackery.  With a monopoly on virtually all cancer treatments, conventional cancer treatments allow the Medical Establishment to earn obscene profits.  So don’t expect any cures to come from the cancer industry because it would kill the ‘golden goose’ that cancer has become.