<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8216;Radioactive Bullet&#8217; Treatment for Cancer</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.smashcancer.com/2009/12/23/radioactive-bullet-treatment-for-cancer/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.smashcancer.com/2009/12/23/radioactive-bullet-treatment-for-cancer/</link>
	<description>Learn about alternative cancer treatments, the Medical Establishment and the Cancer Industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 23:45:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.smashcancer.com/2009/12/23/radioactive-bullet-treatment-for-cancer/comment-page-1/#comment-802</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 May 2010 14:40:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smashcancer.com/blog/?p=103#comment-802</guid>
		<description>I respect your opinion, but I don&#039;t see the value in debating, other than to state our cases.  What I&#039;m saying is not coming from &#039;nowhere&#039;, but from an alternative viewpoint; a view that has nothing to do with profits from protecting lies that are passing for truth.  I just bring up issues and facts that are prohibited from being discussed in public forums that are financed by Big Pharma and the Medical Establishment.  If you think for a moment that the &#039;conventional view&#039; of medicine is totally objective, I have a news flash for you.  NOBODY is 100% OBJECTIVE, and if someone is trying to convince you that they are that, they are lying and most likely, have an ulterior motive!  This is the entire rationale for the Scientific Method, which is the foundation of science.  It is to reduce subjectivity and bias, and to identify the possible sources of bias that may be identified.  It is not possible to eliminate all bias in any scientific observations.

Unfortunately, when you have hundreds of billions of dollars in profits, carefully built careers, status, and a slew of other benefits at stake on a particular paradigm, the people whose lifestyles, status, prestigious titles and careers, high incomes, etc. depend upon the integrity of the &lt;em&gt;status quo&lt;/em&gt;, they will use any and all rationalizations, excuses, subterfuge, intrigue, and any other tactic that they can to protect it.  And they will protect it with a fervent zeal.  And this is exactly what is seen whenever anyone (regardless of the truth of the message or the credentials of the person saying it) challenges the &lt;em&gt;status quo&lt;/em&gt;.  I&#039;ve been studying this topic for years, and it is amazing to see the numbers of honest researchers who have been dumped down the &#039;memory hole&#039; when they go astray of the Conventional Medicine Dogma.

We can discuss anything that you may want to discuss, but if you are committed to simply &#039;Conventional Medicine&#039;, I&#039;m not sure what value it would have for you.  I&#039;m not here to &#039;convert&#039; anyone.  I just provide information to people that are seeking it.  If you are not seeking any information, or are questioning anything, you should go to the American Cancer Society&#039;s web site, or some other similar site.  The thing about &#039;faith&#039; is that it is not based on facts or reasoning, so it cannot be changed with them.  If you &#039;believe&#039; that giving cancer patients chemical warfare chemicals (i.e., chemotherapy) is treatment, have at it...  But if you are seeking truth without any arbitrary boundary, then you&#039;ve come to the right place.  I won&#039;t deny that conventional medical treatments for cancer sometimes works, but if you&#039;ve ever had a loved one die an absolutely horrible, painful, slow, merciless death from chemotherapy, you would understand what I mean when I say that there is definitely a better way.  

There is simply NO WAY that chemotherapy, radiation, and surgery are the best, and only options modern medicine has found to treat cancer!!! Especially after the expenditure of hundreds of billions (if not trillions) of dollars and the toiling of many millions of man-hours of the best &amp; brightest and most highly trained scientists in history.  To believe such is the result of social conditioning, which is an entirely different (but related) topic.  But if you need more information on that, go study about Edward Bernays.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I respect your opinion, but I don&#8217;t see the value in debating, other than to state our cases.  What I&#8217;m saying is not coming from &#8216;nowhere&#8217;, but from an alternative viewpoint; a view that has nothing to do with profits from protecting lies that are passing for truth.  I just bring up issues and facts that are prohibited from being discussed in public forums that are financed by Big Pharma and the Medical Establishment.  If you think for a moment that the &#8216;conventional view&#8217; of medicine is totally objective, I have a news flash for you.  NOBODY is 100% OBJECTIVE, and if someone is trying to convince you that they are that, they are lying and most likely, have an ulterior motive!  This is the entire rationale for the Scientific Method, which is the foundation of science.  It is to reduce subjectivity and bias, and to identify the possible sources of bias that may be identified.  It is not possible to eliminate all bias in any scientific observations.</p>
<p>Unfortunately, when you have hundreds of billions of dollars in profits, carefully built careers, status, and a slew of other benefits at stake on a particular paradigm, the people whose lifestyles, status, prestigious titles and careers, high incomes, etc. depend upon the integrity of the <em>status quo</em>, they will use any and all rationalizations, excuses, subterfuge, intrigue, and any other tactic that they can to protect it.  And they will protect it with a fervent zeal.  And this is exactly what is seen whenever anyone (regardless of the truth of the message or the credentials of the person saying it) challenges the <em>status quo</em>.  I&#8217;ve been studying this topic for years, and it is amazing to see the numbers of honest researchers who have been dumped down the &#8216;memory hole&#8217; when they go astray of the Conventional Medicine Dogma.</p>
<p>We can discuss anything that you may want to discuss, but if you are committed to simply &#8216;Conventional Medicine&#8217;, I&#8217;m not sure what value it would have for you.  I&#8217;m not here to &#8216;convert&#8217; anyone.  I just provide information to people that are seeking it.  If you are not seeking any information, or are questioning anything, you should go to the American Cancer Society&#8217;s web site, or some other similar site.  The thing about &#8216;faith&#8217; is that it is not based on facts or reasoning, so it cannot be changed with them.  If you &#8216;believe&#8217; that giving cancer patients chemical warfare chemicals (i.e., chemotherapy) is treatment, have at it&#8230;  But if you are seeking truth without any arbitrary boundary, then you&#8217;ve come to the right place.  I won&#8217;t deny that conventional medical treatments for cancer sometimes works, but if you&#8217;ve ever had a loved one die an absolutely horrible, painful, slow, merciless death from chemotherapy, you would understand what I mean when I say that there is definitely a better way.  </p>
<p>There is simply NO WAY that chemotherapy, radiation, and surgery are the best, and only options modern medicine has found to treat cancer!!! Especially after the expenditure of hundreds of billions (if not trillions) of dollars and the toiling of many millions of man-hours of the best &amp; brightest and most highly trained scientists in history.  To believe such is the result of social conditioning, which is an entirely different (but related) topic.  But if you need more information on that, go study about Edward Bernays.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: forum profile submission service</title>
		<link>http://www.smashcancer.com/2009/12/23/radioactive-bullet-treatment-for-cancer/comment-page-1/#comment-799</link>
		<dc:creator>forum profile submission service</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 May 2010 01:07:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smashcancer.com/blog/?p=103#comment-799</guid>
		<description>What I wouldnt give to have a debate with you about this.  You just say so many things that come from nowhere that Im pretty sure Id have a fair shot.  Your blog is great visually, I mean people wont be bored.  But others who can see past the videos and the layout wont be so impressed with your generic understanding of this topic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What I wouldnt give to have a debate with you about this.  You just say so many things that come from nowhere that Im pretty sure Id have a fair shot.  Your blog is great visually, I mean people wont be bored.  But others who can see past the videos and the layout wont be so impressed with your generic understanding of this topic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wesley L. McDonald</title>
		<link>http://www.smashcancer.com/2009/12/23/radioactive-bullet-treatment-for-cancer/comment-page-1/#comment-333</link>
		<dc:creator>Wesley L. McDonald</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Feb 2010 02:34:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smashcancer.com/blog/?p=103#comment-333</guid>
		<description>As a Newbie, I am always searching online for articles that can help me. Thank you Wow!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a Newbie, I am always searching online for articles that can help me. Thank you Wow!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Halle Goji Berry</title>
		<link>http://www.smashcancer.com/2009/12/23/radioactive-bullet-treatment-for-cancer/comment-page-1/#comment-162</link>
		<dc:creator>Halle Goji Berry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 16:14:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smashcancer.com/blog/?p=103#comment-162</guid>
		<description>I just want to extend my gratitude a great deal for this indepth blog. I&#039;ve just favorited your website, when I have more free time I will have to have to do some deeper reading of your blog. Well back to searching for &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.gojibenefits.info&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;gogi&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just want to extend my gratitude a great deal for this indepth blog. I&#8217;ve just favorited your website, when I have more free time I will have to have to do some deeper reading of your blog. Well back to searching for <a href="http://www.gojibenefits.info" rel="nofollow">gogi</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cheap host</title>
		<link>http://www.smashcancer.com/2009/12/23/radioactive-bullet-treatment-for-cancer/comment-page-1/#comment-153</link>
		<dc:creator>Cheap host</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 00:03:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smashcancer.com/blog/?p=103#comment-153</guid>
		<description>I usually do not respond to messages, but on this case. WoW! &#039;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I usually do not respond to messages, but on this case. WoW! &#8216;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gregory Despain</title>
		<link>http://www.smashcancer.com/2009/12/23/radioactive-bullet-treatment-for-cancer/comment-page-1/#comment-138</link>
		<dc:creator>Gregory Despain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 22:50:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smashcancer.com/blog/?p=103#comment-138</guid>
		<description>Just to say nice site and interesting posts. If any readers are interested in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lymphedemaadvice.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;lymphedema treatment&lt;/a&gt; they can check this site out</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just to say nice site and interesting posts. If any readers are interested in <a href="http://www.lymphedemaadvice.com/" rel="nofollow">lymphedema treatment</a> they can check this site out</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

