Just watched an excellent video on cancer. The movie basically tells us that cancer is curable, right now. The problem isn’t that cancer is so complex or beyond our comprehension. The biggest problem is that curing incurable diseases makes established mainstream health practitioners angry!
Cancer is Curable Now, view it here: http://canceriscurablenow.tv/home/success/
I had an interesting exchange with a person who, evidently, supports the establishment cancer industry position on cancer treatments, cancer cures, cancer research and related issues. I didn’t think that a comment I had made on the Huffington Post in response to another comment would have engendered such a response, but it did. I found it to be very illustrative of many of the things that I have discussed here on smashcancer.com. But I also thought that by examining what was being said by this person, I could use it as a learning tool. I could see from our ‘dialogue’ that there was no point in trying to have a logical discussion of our points because this person basically had her mind made up.
I can understand how someone could, and would, believe the medical authorities. They’re the authorities! They are the ones that have all of the institutions, the schools, the degrees, the fellowships, the publications, the experts, and associated things. They are the ones that spend and/or expend the resources of time and money to study things like cancer, and they report their findings to us. They are people, and they and their family members suffer & die from cancer, just like everybody else does. So who in their right mind would question their dedication, their work, their never-ending quest to beat cancer? continue reading…
I recently had a discussion with an insurance agent, and as we talked, she revealed to me that she had lost her husband to cancer. We immediately struck up an in-depth conversation about cancer and all of the alternative cancer treatments that they had tried, but to no avail. She was very intelligent and appeared to be very knowledgeable about alternative cancer treatments. She was familiar with most of the treatments that I mentioned.
Luckily, it had been a while since she had lost her husband, so she wasn’t overwhelmed with emotions as we talked. But as we talked, I noticed that she thought that shrinking the tumor was the exact same thing as getting rid of the cancer. I told her that the tumor was NOT the same thing as the cancer. In fact, the tumor is merely a symptom of the cancer. continue reading…
This video covers another anecdotal report from a man (Alan McNutt) who was diagnosed with thyroid cancer in 2000. According to his reports, he started off going to conventional doctors who performed surgery to remove tumors from his thyroid. But the tumors came back. The surgeon who performed the lumpectomy basically told him to go see somebody else when he found out that the tumors returned. He abandoned his patient. This is totally unacceptable. It indicates to me that this physician is not dedicated to helping his patients. He isn’t ambitious enough to continue to seek to help his patient, not willing to search anywhere and everywhere for a solution to his patient’s health condition. Very disturbing to consider that people who have (allegedly) dedicated their lives to helping patients are not dedicated enough to find a cure. continue reading…
This isn’t a brand new story, but it is typical of what happens to alternative cancer treatment practitioners. As you will see, it doesn’t matter whether or not they are licensed physicians or dentists, or whether or not the treatment actually works. The critical factor is whether or not the treatment is profitable to Big Pharma and the related interests. The bottom line is that if the treatment would undermine big corporate profits, it is certain to be scrapped and flushed down the ‘memory hole’.
This is about a treatment method that was actually designed by a Dr. William Kelley, a dentist who operated out of Texas. He used a nutritional approach to fight cancer, and cured himself of what the medical establishment calls terminal Stage 4 pancreatic cancer. His treatment method uses three main strategies to restore the body to health. They are nutritional support, detoxification and supplementation with pancreatic enzymes. These are probably things that would help out someone who was normal, and would not harm anyone in the way that conventional cancer treatments hurt patients. continue reading…
An Essex Superior Court jury found a mother who withheld cancer treatments from her autistic son guilty of attempted murder and assault and battery. Kristen LaBrie was sentenced to 8-10 years in state prison for this incident.
I think that she was negligent because if she decided that she was not going to use conventional cancer treatments, she should have used something else. Unfortunately, most people don’t know about alternative cancer treatments. And if they don’t know about them, they definitely don’t know which ones are the most effective. continue reading…
The British Medical Journal, one of the most prestigious and recognized medical journals in the world, released a 20-year longitudinal study to assess the value of prostate cancer screening. To make a long story short, the result of the study was the finding that the rate of death from prostate cancer was virtually identical for men whether or not they were screened for cancer. The bottom line is that all of the hoopla over PSA testing, digital rectal exams, and the like, are all a bunch of hooey. These tests are ineffective, and is likely being used to railroad a bunch of scared men into having dangerous, unnecessary prostate cancer treatments.
We already wrote about the questionable efficacy of conventional prostate cancer treatments. We also wrote about how ‘watchful waiting’ was said to usually be a much better strategy for most men who are having prostate problems. This is not to belittle the danger of rapidly metastasizing prostate cancers. But in most cases of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), the conventional treatments being bandied about have little benefit, but have a lot of very catastrophic side effects.
For whatever reason, most doctors are myopic when it comes to cancer treatment. The patient should be as knowledgeable as possible about his health situation, and about the disease in question. A physician can only give as much information as the patient is able to understand. So if you do not know much about prostate cancer, the doctor will only be able to go as far as the limit on how much the patient can comprehend. The more knowledge the patient has, the more that him and the doctor can discuss and craft a logical treatment strategy.
We must understand that many doctors resent the iron grip control over medical treatment that is exerted by the American Medical Association (AMA) and other regulatory agencies like the EPA, NIH, etc. And we must not forget the powerful pharmaceutical drug companies interest in maintaining their dominance over medical treatment and medical education. Big Pharma companies finance a large portion of most accredited medical schools in the United States. In this way, they determine the medical school curriculum for budding physicians.
This determines how they think and approach medical treatment. The immense power of this position can not be overemphasized. It amounts to turning physicians into Big Pharma drug peddlers. It is Big Pharma’s way to insure that physicians seek to prescribe their drugs to the majority of patients they encounter. Even if a doctor wakes up and begins to understand that drugs do not cure diseases or solve nutritional imbalances, the medical authorities who control licensing of physicians can take away any medical heretic’s license to practice if they become too vocal, or use non-standard treatments, regardless of their effectiveness. In fact, many safe, effective treatments for cancer have been suppressed by the medical pharmaceutical cartel. It is a matter of record.
Patients should be acutely aware of their health condition. They should find a physician who is open-minded enough to venture outside of the boundaries of medical orthodoxy if a better, safer treatment for cancer is available. Chemotherapy, radiation and surgery are not the best, most effective treatments for cancer, regardless of how loudly and proudly the medical authorities proclaim it. Shouting louder than everybody else, and having a favored status with the mass media does not turn untruths into truths. Open your mind and study this topic, and see where it takes you.
Just when you thought they were sleeping, now the FDA is reported to be prohibiting small pharmacies from manufacturing or distributing injectable vitamin C. This is regardless of the fact that vitamin C is a powerful healing substance that is great for a lot of health conditions.
It is well known in natural health circles that IV vitamin C could almost be termed a ‘miracle cure’ for a wide variety of conditions, especially infections and similar diseases. I have covered some of these conditions in previous writings. But for those who don’t know, it is common knowledge that conventional drugs don’t cure viral diseases such as mononucleosis, hepatitis, influenza, shingles, herpes, etc. In addition to this, there are more and more bacteria that are becoming resistant to antibiotics. continue reading…
I had to ask myself this question after reading a blog entry entitled The Cancer Cure THEY Don’t Want You to Know About, by a writer called Healthseeker. He spoke about apricot kernels and a substance called Xanthohumol as effective, non-toxic treatments for cancer. He actually described cancer as the result of a deficiency of vitamin B-17 (also known as amygdalin, closely related to Laetrile). Xanthohumol is an antioxidant that is derived from hops. I don’t know much about it.
Although the article was not the best, I thought that the author gave someone enough information to stimulate readers to do some research to verify what he said. I must admit that there were no references, no links, no substantiation of anything the author said in the article. But that was not what really surprised me. continue reading…
Researchers at the University of Manchester think that cancer may be a man made disease. They base this opinion on their study of Egyptian mummies. They reported that they only found cancer in a very small portion of the hundreds of mummies that were examined.
This may be a study that borders on the simplistic, but there may be an important truth discovered here. But the researchers did histological studies of the mummies, and also did literary research to see if there was evidence of high rates of cancer. They found that cancer was very uncommon in animals, non-human primates and early human remains. It was also rare in fossils. They also found that even when they found tumors, the vast majority of them were benign. And when they found malignant tumors, the few that were found were in non-human primates. continue reading…