Skip to content

Alternative Cancer Treatment | Cancer Cure | Cancer Remedies

Learn about alternative cancer treatments, the Medical Establishment and the Cancer Industry

Archive

Category: Conventional Treatments

I came across a Radiation Dosage Chart that gives the effects of radiation levels on people.  The chart was fairly detailed and gave a lot of information about the increasing effects of radiation at levels that people may experience in normal life, as well as in other situations.  This is some very important, as well as very revealing information. continue reading…

A device that uses electricity to kill brain tumors, called the NovoTTF, has just been approved by the Food and Drug Administration.  The device is approved for brain cancer patients suffering from malignant tumors called glioblastoma multiforme. This treatment may be an alternative to chemotherapy for patients with advanced brain cancer. continue reading…

The Big Pharma apparatus is at it again. The latest intrusion on people’s rights happened in Detroit.

A mother, Maryanne Godboldo, of a 13 year old girl decided to refuse Big Pharma psychotropic medication.  Child Protective Services (CPS) personnel tried to abduct the child.  They accused her of not giving her daughter psychiatric medication prescribed by her doctor.  The mother says that the medication caused adverse side effects in her child that worsened her condition, so she would not give her the medication.  The medication, Risperdal, has a long track record of causing very serious side effects like vomiting, nausea, lack of coordination, anxiety and dizziness. continue reading…

The British Medical Journal, one of the most prestigious and recognized medical journals in the world, released a 20-year longitudinal study to assess the value of prostate cancer screening.  To make a long story short, the result of the study was the finding that the rate of death from prostate cancer was virtually identical for men whether or not they were screened for cancer.  The bottom line is that all of the hoopla over PSA testing, digital rectal exams, and the like, are all a bunch of hooey.  These tests are ineffective, and is likely being used to railroad a bunch of scared men into having dangerous, unnecessary prostate cancer treatments.

We already wrote about the questionable efficacy of conventional prostate cancer treatments.  We also wrote about how ‘watchful waiting’ was said to usually be a much better strategy for most men who are having prostate problems.  This is not to belittle the danger of rapidly metastasizing prostate cancers. But in most cases of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), the conventional treatments being bandied about have little benefit, but have a lot of very catastrophic side effects.

For whatever reason, most doctors are myopic when it comes to cancer treatment.  The patient should be as knowledgeable as possible about his health situation, and about the disease in question.  A physician can only give as much information as the patient is able to understand.  So if you do not know much about prostate cancer, the doctor will only be able to go as far as the limit on how much the patient can comprehend.  The more knowledge the patient has, the more that him and the doctor can discuss and craft a logical treatment strategy.

We must understand that many doctors resent the iron grip control over medical treatment that is exerted by the American Medical Association (AMA) and other regulatory agencies like the EPA, NIH, etc.  And we must not forget the powerful pharmaceutical drug companies interest in maintaining their dominance over medical treatment and medical education. Big Pharma companies finance a large portion of most accredited medical schools in the United States.  In this way, they determine the medical school curriculum for budding physicians.

This determines how they think and approach medical treatment.  The immense power of this position can not be overemphasized.  It amounts to turning physicians into Big Pharma drug peddlers.  It is Big Pharma’s way to insure that physicians seek to prescribe their drugs to the majority of patients they encounter.  Even if a doctor wakes up and begins to understand that drugs do not cure diseases or solve nutritional imbalances, the medical authorities who control licensing of physicians can take away any medical heretic’s license to practice if they become too vocal, or use non-standard treatments, regardless of their effectiveness.  In fact, many safe, effective treatments for cancer have been suppressed by the medical pharmaceutical cartel.  It is a matter of record.

Patients should be acutely aware of their health condition.  They should find a physician who is open-minded enough to venture outside of the boundaries of medical orthodoxy if a better, safer treatment for cancer is available.  Chemotherapy, radiation and surgery are not the best, most effective treatments for cancer, regardless of how loudly and proudly the medical authorities proclaim it.  Shouting louder than everybody else, and having a favored status with the mass media does not turn untruths into truths.  Open your mind and study this topic, and see where it takes you.

I just read a very good article that speaks about ‘useful idiots’, and I think that is is very relevant to what is happening in the medical field.  It is also a microcosm of what has been happening in all of society, and in all major institutions in society.  I don’t have the time here to delve into all of that, but suffice it to say that virtually all of the things that we take for granted as ‘facts’, are either blatantly false, or that the assumptions and foundations that support them are faulty or specious.  Education, politics, medicine, sociology, economics, history, religion, etc., are all based on some very flawed logic.  I’m not trying to offend anyone, but this has been my experience after many years of studying all of these (and many other) topics.

After learning about the dubious veracity of truths I had been spoon-fed since my youth, I thought that science was not susceptible to such manipulation because it was ‘empirical’.  I was truly naive back then.  But when I got into medical school, my spirit was unsettled, and I could not bring myself to embrace it.  I was wondering where all the cures and effective treatments were, and when we were going to learn about them.  I guess that I figured out that if they weren’t teaching this information to us in medical school, they were never going to share this information with us.  If they aren’t teaching cures in medical school, but instead, were teaching more advanced factoids about physiology, histology, embryology, etc., what’s the point? continue reading…

I had to ask myself this question after reading a blog entry entitled The Cancer Cure THEY Don’t Want You to Know About, by a writer called Healthseeker. He spoke about apricot kernels and a substance called Xanthohumol as effective, non-toxic treatments for cancer.  He actually described cancer as the result of a deficiency of vitamin B-17 (also known as amygdalin, closely related to Laetrile).  Xanthohumol is an antioxidant that is derived from hops.  I don’t know much about it.

Although the article was not the best, I thought that the author gave someone enough information to stimulate readers to do some research to verify what he said.  I must admit that there were no references, no links, no substantiation of anything the author said in the article.  But that was not what really surprised me. continue reading…

Researchers at the University of Manchester think that cancer may be a man made disease.  They base this opinion on their study of Egyptian mummies.  They reported that they only found cancer in a very small portion of the hundreds of mummies that were examined.

This may be a study that borders on the simplistic, but there may be an important truth discovered here.  But the researchers did histological studies of the mummies, and also did literary research to see if there was evidence of high rates of cancer.  They found that cancer was very uncommon in animals, non-human primates and early human remains.  It was also rare in fossils.  They also found that even when they found tumors, the vast majority of them were benign.  And when they found malignant tumors, the few that were found were in non-human primates. continue reading…

Researchers are reporting that they have some new technology that they can use to reduce side effects while increasing the effectiveness of cancer treatments.  They are attempting to deliver the cancer drugs (presumably chemotherapy drugs) directly to tumors, while not damaging normal tissue.  Most traditional chemotherapy drugs are cytotoxic (damaging to normal cells as well as tumor cells).

One of the technologies that is to be used is that of nanoparticles.  They are to be used to create carbon nanotubes (CNT’s) to deliver the drugs directly to the tumor.  A CNT is very small, and would be used to deliver high concentrations of chemotherapeutic drugs into cancer cells, while avoiding exposure to normal cells.  This would also allow the drug to be inside the tumor cells for a longer period of time than normal. continue reading…

Learn the proven way to beat cancer that is backed up by peer-reviewed articles and an MD-PhD, Nobel Prize winning researcher.  This is one of the biggest discoveries in medical history.  It was uncovered by Professor Brian Peskin, a electrical engineer trained at MIT.

Cancer today is a modern epidemic, affecting millions of people.  There is obviously something that is glaringly wrong with the current approaches to cancer treatment and cancer research. Over the last 50-75 years, there has literally been trillions spent on finding a cure for cancer.  Unfortunately, the approaches to cancer treatment have remained virtually the same over this time period. continue reading…

This is a alternative cancer treatment testimonial by Marilyn & Glenn of Brisbane and Coffs Harbour in Australia.  I think that this contains some very valuable information for cancer patients and their caregivers. Each video is about 8 minutes long.

Glenn was diagnosed with esophageal cancer after experiencing reflux symptoms.  Upon examination, he was found to have a 2cm diameter tumor.  He was treated with chemotherapy and radiation.  He had about 5 days of chemotherapy, and 15 days of radiation.  This was not to cure the cancer, but to hit it hard so as to give the surgeons a better chance of removing all of the tumor.  They had planned to remove his esophagus.  Fortunately for them, the surgeons were booked solid, so the surgery was scheduled 6 weeks after the radiation treatments. continue reading…