Skip to content

Alternative Cancer Treatment | Cancer Cure | Cancer Remedies

Learn about alternative cancer treatments, the Medical Establishment and the Cancer Industry

Archive

Tag: cancer research

Award-winning Professor of Medicine, Dr. Samuel Epstein speaks out on the truth about the American Cancer Society (ACS).  This video is about 5 minutes.

He starts by talking about how laden women’s cosmetics and many widely-used skin care products are full of carcinogenic chemicals that are readily absorbed through the skin. continue reading…

Brace yourself for a hard-hitting video that pulls no punches about the current state of cancer research and the cancer industry.  This is some great information that all cancer patients should be aware of, especially if you are considering utilizing conventional cancer treatments.  The cancer industry is huge, and generates in excess of approximately $200 billion per year worldwide.

In summary, the War on Cancer which was started by Nixon in 1972, is an utter failure.  We are constantly fed spin about how a cure for cancer is ‘just around the corner’.  This has been the war cry of the cancer establishment and the Medical Establishment for the last 50-100 years!  But not only is there no cure, but the expenses for cancer treatment have skyrocketed.  In fact, more people are dying of cancer, and people are getting cancer at increasingly younger ages. continue reading…

I thought that this was a very interesting question. There are a lot of scientific claims being made, both by orthodox cancer researchers and also by people outside of the mainstream sources of cancer research. Before we start talking about who is right and who is wrong, I thought that it would be a great idea to actually describe and define exactly what science is. It appears that many people throw around the term, but a lot of people who use it don’t really realize what it actually means.

In rigorous scientific settings, science is not a thing, but it is actually an approach to research that is designed to minimize bias from investigators’ observations. continue reading…

There are a lot of positives related to alternative cancer treatments.  We know that they tend to be less toxic, can be more effective than conventional cancer treatments, work with the body’s systems, preserve and/or strengthen the immune system, as well as many other benefits.  As positive as the people who support alternative cancer treatment methods, there are still some problems and pitfalls that cancer patients should be aware of in regards to this very important topic.  It is very critical that we maintain an attitude of objectivity, and that we do not fall into the trap of thinking of non-mainstream treatments as being a panacea for cancer treatment.

Some of the problems are: continue reading…

We are always bombarded with all sorts of claims of improved treatments for cancer, along with reports of increased survival rates from cancer.  The standard statistic used to describe the effectiveness of cancer treatment is the 5 year survival rate.  This report will be an analysis of this statistic and other related issues.  In short, the cancer survival statistics appear to be ‘massaged’ in order to make conventional cancer treatments appear to be more effective than they really are.  If the true cure rates were widely known, most people would shun them and demand better strategies.

The first problem is with the 5 year survival rate. continue reading…

Scientists have found that fructose sugar feeds cancer cells, and that fructose is metabolized by cancer cells and tumor cells in different ways.  It is known that fructose intake has been linked to pancreatic cancer.

They found that cancer cells have the ability to metabolize fructose to increase their growth rates.  This is critical information for cancer patients to know.  They need to reduce fructose intake.  We already know that sugar fuels cancer cell growth, but this difference in the way that the different sugars are used in the diseased cells is new information. continue reading…

Dr. McLaughlin summarizes the clinical results of the cancer research performed with the use of Paw Paw substances.

The clinical studies were done on breast cancer, prostate cancer, lymphoma non-Hodgkin’s, stage 4 lung cancer and melanoma. The results were very good, very promising.  It appeared that most cancer patients were using Paw Paw in conjunction with conventional cancer treatments. continue reading…

Dr. McLaughlin discussed the scientific findings of his studies on Paw Paw compounds.  He also summarizes the effects and method of action of the acetogenins.

There are over 100 scientific papers on the chemistry and biological effects of Paw Paw. It was also found that the Zebra Swallowtail butterfly eats the leaves of the Paw Paw plant.  That butterfly is an obligate parasite of the plant. It constitutes a defense mechanism for the butterfly because birds that eat them become nauseous and vomit. continue reading…

Dr. McLaughlin discusses more of his cancer research that demonstrates that Paw Paw chemicals are very cytotoxic to tumor cells, but are not very toxic to normal cells.  He also compares Paw Paw acetogenins with the popular chemotherapy drugs Taxol® and cisplatin.

Dr. McLaughlin says that his research has shown that Paw Paw chemicals are extremely toxic to Multi Drug Resistant (MDR) tumor cells. continue reading…

This is a very fascinating video.  Dr. McLaughlin discusses the mechanism of action of the Paw Paw plant chemicals (acetogenins).

The Paw Paw plant chemicals work by inhibiting mitochondria, the energy-producing organelle in cells.  The acetogenins prevent cancer cells from producing energy aerobically (in the presence of oxygen), and also anaerobically (in the absence of oxygen). continue reading…

Take a Look At This

Untitled
Enter ZIP Code: