Alternative Cancer Treatment | Cancer Cure | Cancer Remedies

Cannabinoids have been proven to kill cancer tumor cells.  The active components of marijuana, called cannabinoids, inhibit tumor growth in laboratory animals, and have also been proven to actually kill cancer cells.  In fact, the US government has known this for over 30 years. In fact, cannabinoids have also been demonstrated to kill antibiotic resistant bacteria, like methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), just as effectively as vancomycin and other powerful antibiotics.

continue reading…

I came across a very good article that described the present condition of the United States.  We are taught in school that the United States has a capitalistic economic system.  But upon closer examination, the ideal does not match up with the reality.  It is not just in Big Pharma or orthodox cancer treatments, but in virtually every major institution in American society.

We see the big banks get billions of dollars in bailouts, while there is nothing for failing state, county and municipal governments.  There is always enough money for war and other endeavors that are profitable for the privileged few.  It actually appears that there is an organized war on the Middle Class in America.  Taxes are reduced for the rich while they skyrocket on average people. The alleged debt ceiling debacle appears to be an orchestrated hoax for ulterior motives.  The crap just goes on and on… continue reading…

Although this is an orthodox chemotherapy treatment, it is substantial news, and I decided to speak about it nevertheless because of the high scrutiny under which Avastin (bevacizumab) has been subjected.  This substance already has approval for a variety of cancers, such as colon, brain, kidney, and lung cancers.

Bevacizumab (Avastin) works by blocking angiogenesis (i.e., the growth of new blood vessels that enable tumors to grow).  It is a humanized monoclonal antibody that inhibits vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGF-A). It was the first angiogenesis inhibitor available in the United States for clinical applications.  It received its first approval for cancer treatment in 2004 when used in combination with standard chemotherapy for metastatic colon cancer and non-small cell lung cancer. continue reading…

Dr Samuel S. Epstein, a world-renowned professor emeritus of Environmental and Occupational Medicine from the University of Illinois School of Public Health, wrote a scathing indictment of the orthodox cancer establishment.  He has written over 250 peer-reviewed journal articles and 20 books on medical topics.  He is one of the world’s leading critics of the cancer establishment with his insightful, highly documented analysis of the cancer industry.

In short, Epstein’s book (entitled NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE and AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY: Criminal Indifference to Cancer Prevention and Conflicts of Interest) states that the National Cancer Institute (NCI) and the American Cancer Society (ACS), as well as the cancer industry in general, are more focused on profits and maintaining the status quo of orthodox cancer treatments.  There has been no organizational focus on cancer prevention. This is one reason why cancer incidence rates have increased at an astronomical rate. continue reading…

There is a lot of controversy about the findings of a Dr Tullio Simoncini regarding the use of sodium bicarbonate for cancer therapy.  He says that based on his study and experience, cancer is a fungus, candida albicans to be exact.  He also claims that he has been having great success in the treatment of solid tumors with the use of sodium bicarbonate (baking soda).  But mainstream medical authorities like the American Cancer Society have been negative about these developments.

The American Cancer Society web site on sodium bicarbonate is precisely worded.  They never actually come out and say that baking soda does not work on cancer.  They make a bunch of leading statements about the topic.  They basically say that available scientific evidence does not support claims that cancer is caused by yeasts or molds, that sodium bicarbonate treats cancer, and that these claims are not supported by clinical or scientific evidence. continue reading…

An Essex Superior Court jury found a mother who withheld cancer treatments from her autistic son guilty of attempted murder and assault and battery.  Kristen LaBrie was sentenced to 8-10 years in state prison for this incident.

I think that she was negligent because if she decided that she was not going to use conventional cancer treatments, she should have used something else.  Unfortunately, most people don’t know about alternative cancer treatments.  And if they don’t know about them, they definitely don’t know which ones are the most effective. continue reading…

The British Medical Journal, one of the most prestigious and recognized medical journals in the world, released a 20-year longitudinal study to assess the value of prostate cancer screening.  To make a long story short, the result of the study was the finding that the rate of death from prostate cancer was virtually identical for men whether or not they were screened for cancer.  The bottom line is that all of the hoopla over PSA testing, digital rectal exams, and the like, are all a bunch of hooey.  These tests are ineffective, and is likely being used to railroad a bunch of scared men into having dangerous, unnecessary prostate cancer treatments.

We already wrote about the questionable efficacy of conventional prostate cancer treatments.  We also wrote about how ‘watchful waiting’ was said to usually be a much better strategy for most men who are having prostate problems.  This is not to belittle the danger of rapidly metastasizing prostate cancers. But in most cases of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), the conventional treatments being bandied about have little benefit, but have a lot of very catastrophic side effects.

For whatever reason, most doctors are myopic when it comes to cancer treatment.  The patient should be as knowledgeable as possible about his health situation, and about the disease in question.  A physician can only give as much information as the patient is able to understand.  So if you do not know much about prostate cancer, the doctor will only be able to go as far as the limit on how much the patient can comprehend.  The more knowledge the patient has, the more that him and the doctor can discuss and craft a logical treatment strategy.

We must understand that many doctors resent the iron grip control over medical treatment that is exerted by the American Medical Association (AMA) and other regulatory agencies like the EPA, NIH, etc.  And we must not forget the powerful pharmaceutical drug companies interest in maintaining their dominance over medical treatment and medical education. Big Pharma companies finance a large portion of most accredited medical schools in the United States.  In this way, they determine the medical school curriculum for budding physicians.

This determines how they think and approach medical treatment.  The immense power of this position can not be overemphasized.  It amounts to turning physicians into Big Pharma drug peddlers.  It is Big Pharma’s way to insure that physicians seek to prescribe their drugs to the majority of patients they encounter.  Even if a doctor wakes up and begins to understand that drugs do not cure diseases or solve nutritional imbalances, the medical authorities who control licensing of physicians can take away any medical heretic’s license to practice if they become too vocal, or use non-standard treatments, regardless of their effectiveness.  In fact, many safe, effective treatments for cancer have been suppressed by the medical pharmaceutical cartel.  It is a matter of record.

Patients should be acutely aware of their health condition.  They should find a physician who is open-minded enough to venture outside of the boundaries of medical orthodoxy if a better, safer treatment for cancer is available.  Chemotherapy, radiation and surgery are not the best, most effective treatments for cancer, regardless of how loudly and proudly the medical authorities proclaim it.  Shouting louder than everybody else, and having a favored status with the mass media does not turn untruths into truths.  Open your mind and study this topic, and see where it takes you.

Learn the proven way to beat cancer that is backed up by peer-reviewed articles and an MD-PhD, Nobel Prize winning researcher.  This is one of the biggest discoveries in medical history.  It was uncovered by Professor Brian Peskin, a electrical engineer trained at MIT.

Cancer today is a modern epidemic, affecting millions of people.  There is obviously something that is glaringly wrong with the current approaches to cancer treatment and cancer research. Over the last 50-75 years, there has literally been trillions spent on finding a cure for cancer.  Unfortunately, the approaches to cancer treatment have remained virtually the same over this time period. continue reading…

This man was diagnosed with a brain tumor in 2004.  He was given only 1-1.5 years to live. He first chose to go with chemotherapy.  It made him so sick that he did not want to do it again.  He tells his story below.

In short, he became very sick from the chemotherapy and declined to undergo further treatments.  He had a lot of kidney stones subsequent to these conventional cancer treatments.  Upon the advice of family and close friends, he decided to go down to Tijuana, Mexico to a hospital called the International Bio Care Hospital and Medical Center for further cancer treatment. continue reading…

I couldn’t contain myself after going to a blog that discusses cancer treatments. They were essentially talking negatively about homeopathic treatments for cancer in this blog post.  I found it interesting.  I am not sure about the effectiveness of homeopathy treatments for any disease.  Personally, I haven’t seen or found any evidence for the effectiveness of homeopathy.  It seemed to me to be an easy target for derision.  I noticed that they didn’t choose to discuss any more efficacious treatments, such as Laetrile/B-17, Hoxsey’s formula, Essiac, etc.

So I went ahead and posted my own comments on the topic.  I think it was a board that will probably be adverse to my comments and views, but I went ahead and posted it anyway.  I’ll just post here what I said and let you check it out: continue reading…