Alternative Cancer Treatment | Cancer Cure | Cancer Remedies

Researchers at the University of Manchester think that cancer may be a man made disease.  They base this opinion on their study of Egyptian mummies.  They reported that they only found cancer in a very small portion of the hundreds of mummies that were examined.

This may be a study that borders on the simplistic, but there may be an important truth discovered here.  But the researchers did histological studies of the mummies, and also did literary research to see if there was evidence of high rates of cancer.  They found that cancer was very uncommon in animals, non-human primates and early human remains.  It was also rare in fossils.  They also found that even when they found tumors, the vast majority of them were benign.  And when they found malignant tumors, the few that were found were in non-human primates. continue reading…

Although we have all sorts of claims from medical professionals about the marvels of modern medicine, most of it is a bunch of crap.  We have made a lot of progress in Emergency Medicine and some forms of diagnosis.  But with the proliferation of drugs and chronic diseases like cancer, heart disease and autoimmune disorders, there is something very wrong with a lot of what we call ‘modern medicine’.

I found an article by Dr. Mark Sircus that speaks on some of these topics.  He actually calls out Dr. Andrew Weil and Dr. Keith Scott-Mumby for their questionable stands.  Weil goes off on Dr. Simoncini, and claims that his findings are bizarre, nonsensical, and not supported by any scientific studies.  For you who don’t know. Dr. Simoncini is the French physician that asserts that he has found that most (if not all) cancers are either caused by fungus/candida, and that he has had success in treating it with sodium bicarbonate. Dr. Scott-Mumby was found to actually support the use of highly toxic mercury in vaccines. I don’t even know what to say about that other than it is depressingly ridiculous. continue reading…

Researchers are reporting that they have some new technology that they can use to reduce side effects while increasing the effectiveness of cancer treatments.  They are attempting to deliver the cancer drugs (presumably chemotherapy drugs) directly to tumors, while not damaging normal tissue.  Most traditional chemotherapy drugs are cytotoxic (damaging to normal cells as well as tumor cells).

One of the technologies that is to be used is that of nanoparticles.  They are to be used to create carbon nanotubes (CNT’s) to deliver the drugs directly to the tumor.  A CNT is very small, and would be used to deliver high concentrations of chemotherapeutic drugs into cancer cells, while avoiding exposure to normal cells.  This would also allow the drug to be inside the tumor cells for a longer period of time than normal. continue reading…

This is a alternative cancer treatment testimonial by Marilyn & Glenn of Brisbane and Coffs Harbour in Australia.  I think that this contains some very valuable information for cancer patients and their caregivers. Each video is about 8 minutes long.

Glenn was diagnosed with esophageal cancer after experiencing reflux symptoms.  Upon examination, he was found to have a 2cm diameter tumor.  He was treated with chemotherapy and radiation.  He had about 5 days of chemotherapy, and 15 days of radiation.  This was not to cure the cancer, but to hit it hard so as to give the surgeons a better chance of removing all of the tumor.  They had planned to remove his esophagus.  Fortunately for them, the surgeons were booked solid, so the surgery was scheduled 6 weeks after the radiation treatments. continue reading…

This testimonial is by Dorothy from Melbourne, Australia.  She is 64 years old at the time of the video.  She was a stay-at-home mother.

Dorothy was diagnosed with ovarian cancer in December of 2002.  She underwent surgery in January of 2003 to remove her ovarian tumor and about one half of her colon because the tumor had metastasized.  She was left having to use a colostomy bag afterward. She underwent chemotherapy from February to May of 2003.  During this time, she learned about a physician with an MD and was also a naturopath. continue reading…

This is a testimonial for alternative cancer treatments from an Australian named Paul.  He is 66 years old at the time of the video, and worked as an architect before he was not able to pursue his career anymore.

Paul was diagnosed with a non-Hodgkins lymphoma around 1997.  He said that it was a small cell, low grade, slow-growing type of cancer.  His physicians told him that his cancer would not respond to any forms of radiation or chemotherapy.  This meant that Paul had no choice but to pursue alternative cancer treatment methods.  He reports that he is happy that he did not do any traditional cancer treatment methods (i.e., chemotherapy, radiation or surgery). continue reading…

This is another cancer patient, Chris of Adelaide, Australia.  He basically give his own testimonial.

In short, Chris was experiencing constipation, blood in his stools and piles (hemorrhoids).  He went to physicians and was diagnosed with Stage 4 rectal cancer.  He said that he was not in much pain at that time. The tumor was fairly large, at 13-16 cm. continue reading…

Physicians had no answers to this man’s cancer problem, but he found effective actions in spite of this.

It just goes to show you that just because the ‘experts’ may be dumbfounded, that doesn’t mean that there isn’t an answer to your questions and solutions to your health problems.

But you must be aware that this is what is termed an ‘anecdotal’ report, and isn’t scientifically valid.  By that same token, there is something here that is worthy of study because of the positive result that Brad received by doing what he did.  The scientific standard for a study is called the randomized, double-blind study. Neither the experimental subjects or the researchers know who is in the control group (the group that receives no treatment or a placebo) and the experimental group (the group that receives the treatment under investigation). continue reading…

This is another man who has worked to treat and cure cancer. He tells a bit about his story and what he has done.

This man was diagnosed with cancer, and had cancer surgery to remove tumors from his ear and other structures that were near it (i.e., lymph nodes, neck muscles, etc.).  He was told that all the cancer was removed, but he later found more tumor growths on his head.  The physicians told him that chemotherapy and radiation would not work on his form of melanoma.  At that point, he declined to undergo further conventional cancer treatments. continue reading…

Hyperthermia is really not a totally alternative cancer treatment, but it may have value as a treatment.  It appears to enhance the effectiveness of conventional cancer treatments without adding any toxicity or side effects.  I think that it may be of value to the cancer patient that still wants to use chemotherapy and/or radiation treatments.

Hyperthermia can be used by itself, but is usually applied in conjunction with chemotherapy and/or radiation.  This treatment can damage or kill cancer cells by itself, but is usually more effective when used with other treatments.  This treatment may be somewhat related to IPT (Insulin Potentiation Therapy) as well.

Another advantage of this method is that it is relatively inexpensive.  It is also not toxic.  One apparatus that is used to apply the heat is called the BSG 2000, which is manufactured by the BSG Medical Corporation. continue reading…