Alternative Cancer Treatment | Cancer Cure | Cancer Remedies

The topic of GM foods is a very controversial topic.  The companies that produce them claim that they are necessary to feed the world.  They also say that GMO foods are safe for human consumption, as well as for use in other products, such as vaccines, pharmaceutical drugs, animal feed, and other myriad uses.

Proponents in favor of GM products say that they are safe, and are not substantially different from food products derived from normal cultivation methods.  Those who are wary of their use say that they have unknown effects at best, and that they are extremely dangerous at worse. continue reading…

Hyperthermia is really not a totally alternative cancer treatment, but it may have value as a treatment.  It appears to enhance the effectiveness of conventional cancer treatments without adding any toxicity or side effects.  I think that it may be of value to the cancer patient that still wants to use chemotherapy and/or radiation treatments.

Hyperthermia can be used by itself, but is usually applied in conjunction with chemotherapy and/or radiation.  This treatment can damage or kill cancer cells by itself, but is usually more effective when used with other treatments.  This treatment may be somewhat related to IPT (Insulin Potentiation Therapy) as well.

Another advantage of this method is that it is relatively inexpensive.  It is also not toxic.  One apparatus that is used to apply the heat is called the BSG 2000, which is manufactured by the BSG Medical Corporation. continue reading…

This is the final part of this video series, and is probably the most disturbing part.  There are various people who describe the extent to which Big Pharma has infested the entire medical research process, as well as the regulatory function.  It has devolved into a big circus where the ringmasters and workers all share in the profits, all at the expense of the audience and the joke is on the unwitting patients who actually think that they are being given the most advanced, benevolent, modern medical care available.  This is obviously not the case.

Before 1980, most drug research was performed by university professors.  After 1991, the drug studies were starting to be performed by Big Pharma companies.  It was either performed by their employed scientists, or was funded by pharmaceutical companies.  There is one glaring problem with this arrangement.  This put the entire research process under the control of Big Pharma companies that stood to gain from releasing their drugs on schedule, and with no obstacles such as pesky toxicity and bad side effects. continue reading…

Award-winning Professor of Medicine, Dr. Samuel Epstein speaks out on the truth about the American Cancer Society (ACS).  This video is about 5 minutes.

He starts by talking about how laden women’s cosmetics and many widely-used skin care products are full of carcinogenic chemicals that are readily absorbed through the skin. continue reading…

Mammography is touted as the best way for women to protect themselves from breast cancer.  Is this really the case?  It appears that, once again, we are being subjected to propaganda, media spin and an agenda of protecting corporate profits at the expense of cancer patients and unsuspecting victims of Big Pharma and related entities.  This video is about 10 minutes.

The American Cancer Society (ACS) vigorously promotes mammography as a woman’s best way to fight breast cancer while scaring up women with fears of contracting the disease.   It is reported that mammograms are not very accurate.  In fact, they have approximately a 70% failure rate!  The Nordic Cochrane Center reports that about 7,000 women per year are improperly diagnosed with breast cancer, which leads to unnecessary treatments. continue reading…

I thought that this was a very interesting question. There are a lot of scientific claims being made, both by orthodox cancer researchers and also by people outside of the mainstream sources of cancer research. Before we start talking about who is right and who is wrong, I thought that it would be a great idea to actually describe and define exactly what science is. It appears that many people throw around the term, but a lot of people who use it don’t really realize what it actually means.

In rigorous scientific settings, science is not a thing, but it is actually an approach to research that is designed to minimize bias from investigators’ observations. continue reading…

This is another great video that discusses the origins of the AMA and how it was a tiny trade association before they aligned with growing corporations and industrialists like Rockefeller to monopolize the medical field.  They turned medicine into a profit-making enterprise, with little regard for the effects upon the patients receiving the toxic treatments.

This video speaks on alternative cancer treatment people like Hoxsey and Dr Andrew Ivy who worked with Krebiozen.  Hoxsey used a herbal tonic to successfully treat scores of cancer patients, and Dr. Ivy was a well-respected medical researcher who was trashed after he embraced the non-allopathic substance.

Hoxsey and Dr Ivy both described deliberate conspiracies that were used to squash them.  It is one thing when something is a ‘conspiracy theory’, but totally different when there is actual evidence to prove that these conspiracies are real.  Don’t let the people who profit from this to use you as their own personalized profit center.  It wouldn’t be quite so bad if these allopathic treatments weren’t poisonous and dangerous, but they are. Educate yourself and take back your power so that you can use it for your own benefit.

I have seen reports that Vitamin C, given intravenously, is a powerful form of treatment for cancer.  I hope that you already realize that Big Pharma will definitely be against this because it will mean the end of charging exorbitant rates for chemotherapy drugs and radiation ‘therapy’.  They can’t patent Vitamin C. And this is the reason why they will never do any research on it, or work to make it popular.

The corporations’ only priority is to make profit.  All other considerations are of relatively minor importance.  Meditate on this and understand it.  It is the key to understanding the data that passes for news and ‘scientific’ studies that you see plastered all throughout the mass media.  Remember that the mass media gets paid billions of dollars for all of those polished advertisements for pharmaceutical drugs.  So they make money while the patients get to take poisons masquerading as medicines.

I found an article that speaks about the use of internet searches to find and correlate data from various online databases that may offer help in finding new treatments for cancer.  The title of the paper is The Power of the Web in Cancer Drug Discovery and Clinical Trial Design: Research without a Laboratory? The article caught my attention, and appears to have good information for use by medical professionals.  But as you probably already suspect, I have a few concerns with it.

Although it is a good idea to use the internet to find new treatments for cancer, the authors of the article give away their bias right in the title. continue reading…