Alternative Cancer Treatment | Cancer Cure | Cancer Remedies

This is a alternative cancer treatment testimonial by Marilyn & Glenn of Brisbane and Coffs Harbour in Australia.  I think that this contains some very valuable information for cancer patients and their caregivers. Each video is about 8 minutes long.

Glenn was diagnosed with esophageal cancer after experiencing reflux symptoms.  Upon examination, he was found to have a 2cm diameter tumor.  He was treated with chemotherapy and radiation.  He had about 5 days of chemotherapy, and 15 days of radiation.  This was not to cure the cancer, but to hit it hard so as to give the surgeons a better chance of removing all of the tumor.  They had planned to remove his esophagus.  Fortunately for them, the surgeons were booked solid, so the surgery was scheduled 6 weeks after the radiation treatments. continue reading…

This testimonial is by Dorothy from Melbourne, Australia.  She is 64 years old at the time of the video.  She was a stay-at-home mother.

Dorothy was diagnosed with ovarian cancer in December of 2002.  She underwent surgery in January of 2003 to remove her ovarian tumor and about one half of her colon because the tumor had metastasized.  She was left having to use a colostomy bag afterward. She underwent chemotherapy from February to May of 2003.  During this time, she learned about a physician with an MD and was also a naturopath. continue reading…

This is another cancer patient, Chris of Adelaide, Australia.  He basically give his own testimonial.

In short, Chris was experiencing constipation, blood in his stools and piles (hemorrhoids).  He went to physicians and was diagnosed with Stage 4 rectal cancer.  He said that he was not in much pain at that time. The tumor was fairly large, at 13-16 cm. continue reading…

Physicians had no answers to this man’s cancer problem, but he found effective actions in spite of this.

It just goes to show you that just because the ‘experts’ may be dumbfounded, that doesn’t mean that there isn’t an answer to your questions and solutions to your health problems.

But you must be aware that this is what is termed an ‘anecdotal’ report, and isn’t scientifically valid.  By that same token, there is something here that is worthy of study because of the positive result that Brad received by doing what he did.  The scientific standard for a study is called the randomized, double-blind study. Neither the experimental subjects or the researchers know who is in the control group (the group that receives no treatment or a placebo) and the experimental group (the group that receives the treatment under investigation). continue reading…

This is another man who has worked to treat and cure cancer. He tells a bit about his story and what he has done.

This man was diagnosed with cancer, and had cancer surgery to remove tumors from his ear and other structures that were near it (i.e., lymph nodes, neck muscles, etc.).  He was told that all the cancer was removed, but he later found more tumor growths on his head.  The physicians told him that chemotherapy and radiation would not work on his form of melanoma.  At that point, he declined to undergo further conventional cancer treatments. continue reading…

Mammography is touted as the best way for women to protect themselves from breast cancer.  Is this really the case?  It appears that, once again, we are being subjected to propaganda, media spin and an agenda of protecting corporate profits at the expense of cancer patients and unsuspecting victims of Big Pharma and related entities.  This video is about 10 minutes.

The American Cancer Society (ACS) vigorously promotes mammography as a woman’s best way to fight breast cancer while scaring up women with fears of contracting the disease.   It is reported that mammograms are not very accurate.  In fact, they have approximately a 70% failure rate!  The Nordic Cochrane Center reports that about 7,000 women per year are improperly diagnosed with breast cancer, which leads to unnecessary treatments. continue reading…

Colorectal cancer is one of the most commonly diagnosed cancers in the United States, and is the third most common cancer related disease.  It is estimated for 2010 that 102,900 new cases of colon cancer, and 39,370 new cases of rectal cancer will be diagnosed.  It is the third leading cause of cancer-related deaths.  It is important to recognize the symptoms of this disease, and to understand that the risk of being diagnosed with it increase dramatically after a person reaches 50 years of age.

Cancer is known to be uncontrolled growth of bodily cells.  Metastasis is when the cancer cells originate in one part of the body, and then migrate to other areas of the body and set up other secondary tumors in these locations. continue reading…

I came across a report that claims that the anticancer drug, Avastin, can help ovarian cancer patients.  The drug, which is commonly used to treat colon, breast and brain cancers, now may have an application in ovarian cancer.

Researchers added Avastin to a standard chemotherapy and maintenance regimen to a group of women with cancer of the ovaries or closely related areas. They found that the women who were given Avastin lived an average of four months longer without the disease progressing than those who did not receive it.

Avastin is not without a level of controversy in its history.  Some experts objected to FDA approval of it for metastatic breast cancer because the drug only slows tumor growth, but fails to extend survival.  The FDA approved it for use anyway, even though a panel of outside advisers voted 5 to 4 against approval.  Although Avastin reduces tumor size and shows an increase in progression-free survival time, it does not prolong or increase the quality of life for late-stage cancer patients. continue reading…

Although this is a complex topic, there are some general considerations that should be discussed.  I have seen the diet recommendations from the American Cancer Society.  Some of it is good information, but a lot of it may be vague and somewhat misleading.  There is no real rationale for the things that they say in their recommendations.  It doesn’t give a patient any sort of framework with which to evaluate information. It looks like the patient will have to do his own research to reach an understanding.

The first thing I noticed when looking through the information is that they did not discuss the relationship between cancer cells and sugar. continue reading…

There are side effects that are a result of tumor removal.  Surgery is usually used to remove cancerous growths and tumors, whether benign or malignant.  Cancer surgery has become complex, as there are a number of different techniques and instruments that are used to remove tumors.  Biopsies are also performed as well.  The biopsy is an invasive procedure in which a sample of the growth is surgically removed for study.  The unfortunate result of a biopsy is that the encapsulated growth is now opened up, and cells from the growth are released into the body.  If the growth is malignant, this means that the cells are now able to metastasize throughout the body.

Side Effects continue reading…